?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Q = (NOT A OR B) AND (NOT C)

People shouldn't be allowed to think about things like this at 1:30 in the morning:


That translates to Q = (NOT A OR B) AND (NOT C), duh.

Comments

( 9 comments — Leave a comment )
privatelyricist
Apr. 13th, 2005 12:46 am (UTC)
you do maths i'll do paint
idigital
Apr. 13th, 2005 08:46 am (UTC)
Deal.
supersat
Apr. 13th, 2005 01:36 am (UTC)
I feel like I should be making a Karnaugh map.
idigital
Apr. 13th, 2005 08:46 am (UTC)
Just googled "Karnaugh", and it looks scary. :(
supersat
Apr. 13th, 2005 05:56 pm (UTC)
It really isn't. It's a shitload easier to optimize boolean functions with them than with the various theorems. ;)
kickupthefire
Apr. 13th, 2005 03:00 am (UTC)
wouldnt it be better to explain it like Q=((not A) OR (B)) AND (not C)

and there's conditions for + and . meaning OR and AND, like whether the variables are dependent or independent of each other
idigital
Apr. 13th, 2005 08:45 am (UTC)
Yes. And yes.

It was stupid-o'clock, and my brain was exploding. :(
oneko_briar
Apr. 13th, 2005 07:28 am (UTC)
instead
doesn't that translate to "Q equals not-C multiplied by not-A_plus_B?
idigital
Apr. 13th, 2005 08:45 am (UTC)
Re: instead
Probably, yeah.

It was stupid-o'clock, and my brain was exploding. :(
( 9 comments — Leave a comment )